Continue to move the slider until you find your desired width.


Archive for the 'In The News' Category

Mika stands up for Journalism!

Thursday, June 28th, 2007

The communist can’t stop change either…

Saturday, June 23rd, 2007

HONG KONG, June 23 — Old-time Hong Kongers sometimes call themselves the “people beneath Lion Rock,” after the ragged peak that looms over the peninsula joining Hong Kong to mainland China.

At the mountain’s base is the leafy suburb of Kowloon Tong. It has never been a big tourist draw, but in the decade since territorial control returned to China, this quintessentially Hong Kong neighborhood has had many more visitors — and important changes.

Of the two barracks that used to house British troops here, one lies empty and neglected, visited only by a cleaning woman who goes to sweep up the leaves. The other now belongs to the People’s Liberation Army, though Chinese uniforms are rarely seen.

But the mainland presence is inescapable in many other places. At the local rail station, where the Hong Kong subway links with the train from Guangdong Province, raucous crowds of mainlanders spill onto the platforms, and jam the escalators with huge suitcases. Police officers hover and check identification cards.

In the shopping mall connected to the station, mainland tourists snap up designer goods. The nearby university is registering more mainland students than ever.

Since the British handed over Hong Kong on July 1, 1997, skyscrapers have gone up and down; momentous political battles have been fought. But few developments have affected the average Hong Konger more than the opening of the border with the mainland.

Since 1997, more than half a million mainlanders have been allowed to move here, and 13.6 million visit each year — almost double the resident population. Meanwhile, the number of people who live on one side of the border and work on the other has soared — to 500,000 from about 50,000 in the early 1990s.

In their journey into one of the world’s most open and affluent economies, the mainlanders bring their own distinctive dialects, ways and aspirations. They have reshaped just about every aspect of life here — from the conduct of business and social life, to commuting, marriage and education.

Migration from the mainland is hardly new. But for decades, it was defined by revolution and political turmoil on one side of the “bamboo curtain,” while a British colony prospered on the other. Most of the old migrants were refugees, fleeing poverty, famine, Communism and persecution across a fortified international border. Many swam here.

Post-1997 migrants, by contrast, are more likely to be legal workers, professionals and university students.

Hong Kongers now shop across the old border in Shenzhen as casually as American families drive to a mall in another town. Cross-border marriages are on the rise. Hong Kong’s incessant street chatter has become trilingual: Cantonese, English and the mainland’s lingua franca, Mandarin.

Even Hong Kong’s famed action movies have changed: if four gangsters plot a killing, two speak Cantonese and two argue back in Mandarin.

And then there are the commuters.

“There are about half a million people crossing that border regularly, and they are not tourists,” said Michael DeGolyer of Hong Kong Baptist University, who has traced social and political changes since 1989 through the Hong Kong Transition Project.

One regular crosser is Chan Tit-keung, a Hong Kong taxi driver who now lives near Shenzhen.

“I live in a big, 1,000-square-foot flat by myself, and you can get a nice place for 2,000 yuan” a month, or about $250, he said. “You can’t afford a place like that in Hong Kong. I live outside the city, so the air is cleaner. And on my days off, I can go for long walks.”

But he is less happy to see mainlanders moving into Hong Kong in search of higher wages — helping to lower them. Hong Kong has no legal minimum wage.

“Before, it was easier for older guys like us to find casual work in Hong Kong, and now it’s harder,” he said. “It’s because the mainland workers have come down” in the wages they accept for their work. Mr. Chan identifies himself as Hong Kong Chinese, to set himself apart from his mainland neighbors.

“People there squat on the ground and smoke everywhere and fight in the bars, which is why I don’t really go out when I’m on the mainland,” he said. “And when I have to see a doctor, I come back down over the border with my Hong Kong ID card.”

After the shock of the 1989 Tiananmen crackdown, Hong Kongers emigrated in large numbers to Western countries. As China’s political situation has stabilized and its economy surged, émigrés have been returning.

Lau Tak-man, who runs a bookstore in the bustling Tsim Sha Tsui district, moved to New Zealand with her children in the early 1990s. But she eventually returned, saying things were “more relaxed.”

“The spirit here is better,” she said, as customers streamed in and out of her shop late one evening.

If local anxiety once centered on the Chinese government, now it is on how the city will accommodate the new arrivals. The “biliterate, trilingual” policy in schools, once feared, now seems to have been accepted as an asset, but the local news media blame the mainlanders for crime, disease, undercutting the job market. They highlight stories of the large numbers of pregnant mainlanders crossing the border to give birth here and so guarantee their children rights to permanent residence.

“There is definitely discrimination,” said Sze Lai-shan, a mainland-born social worker who runs the New Immigrants Project for the Society for Community Organization, a nonprofit group in Hong Kong. “They go to a job interview and the employer hears the mainland accent on their Cantonese. Even if the job doesn’t require much talking or use of Cantonese, they won’t be hired. And if they are hired, they will be paid less.”

A study that Ms. Sze’s group released in 2003 showed that mainland women tended to be employed as cleaners, garbage collectors and kitchen workers, with little legal protection for their rights. Nearly half were working seven days a week.

Ron Paul takes no crap!

Sunday, June 17th, 2007

If only….(Leave a comment and complete the statement)!

Thursday, May 31st, 2007

He should be President…he reads the reports!!

Saturday, May 26th, 2007

Ron Paul’s not taking any crap!

Friday, May 18th, 2007

Right-wing blogs discover massive conspiracy to hide WMDs in Iraq

Sunday, April 22nd, 2007

Melanie Phillips is a British neoconservative who has devoted herself to warning England that Muslims are taking over and destroying its culture. read more | digg story

Your tax dollars at work!

Saturday, April 21st, 2007

Prison releases felon after getting phony fax
Officials released a prisoner from a state facility after receiving a phony fax that ordered the man be freed, and didn’t catch the mistake for nearly two weeks.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18251472/from/ET/

Any wonder why I don’t swim in the Ocean?

Saturday, April 21st, 2007

Fishermen land 1,063-pound mako shark
They knew they were gonna need a bigger boat. The crew of the Sea Ya Later II hooked a 1,063-pound mako shark in the Gulf of Mexico Wednesday. The 12-foot-6-inch shark was half the size of their 23-foot boat.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18250012/

These abortion people are so full of crap…

Saturday, April 21st, 2007

In the way gall bladder removal is a made up name for a medical procedure called a Cholecystectomy, Partial-birth abortion is made up name for a medical procedure called a D & E.

This medical procedure is used when a fetus has a head 2 x (or more) normal size, and the mother would be caused physical damage by attempting to reach term and give birth either, naturally or by c-section. Usually the damage caused is this situation would prevent the woman from having another child.

I have to ask…If you’re so “pro-life” aren’t you for her having as many kids as she can? Why would you risk taking the chance to have a healthy child away from her? It seems to me the actions defeat the groups stated goals.

But here’s the really strange part, the law allows for this to be done if the mother’s health is at risk. Since the only time this procedure is called for is when the mother’s health is at risk, the same number of them are going to be performed. If someone can produce a doctor who would allow a woman to show up in her 8th month with a normal fetus and have this procedure performed, as has been stated, I will gladly lead the charge to castigate his malpractice in public, as would any reasonable person. The law appears to be a ruse as it creates no change, just bragging rights.

Any politician who supports, or supported, this should be voted out of office, regardless of party. Any civic leader who supports this should be pelted with vegetables in the public square.

C-SPAN isn’t as boring as you think.

Friday, April 20th, 2007


Bad Behavior has blocked 18 access attempts in the last 7 days.